| Additional Menu |
| Focus & Scope |
| Editorial Team |
| Reviewer Team |
| Peer Review Process |
| Publication Ethics |
| Plagiarism |
| Author Guidelines |
| Author Fees |
| Contact Us |
Peer reviewer process
Inklusi: Journal of Education for Children with Special Needs uses a double-blind review policy, in which the identities of both authors and reviewers are hidden until the article submitted is published.
Research articles submitted to this online journal will be reviewed by at least 2 (two) reviewers. The research articles received will be available online after the peer-reviewing process of the journal. The language used in this journal is English or Indonesian.
Peer reviews are designed to assess the validity, quality, and often the authenticity of articles for publication. The main purpose is to maintain the integrity of science by filtering articles that are invalid or of low quality.
From the publisher's point of view, peer reviews serve as a filter for content, directing better quality articles to better quality magazines and thus creating magazine brands.
Running articles through the peer review process adds value to them. For this reason, publishers need to make sure that peer reviews are strong.
The best peer review.
What a peer review does best is to improve the quality of published papers by motivating the author to submit a good quality work and helping to improve that work through the peer-review process.
Each article submitted will be evaluated based on:
1. The authenticity of his contributions to the field of scientific publication; the accuracy of the theory and methodology given to the topic; the consistency of his analysis; his ability to communicate with the reader (grammatic and style); and the format of writing in accordance with the journal delivery guidelines.
2. The normal rotation time for inspection and evaluation of the manuscript is 1 to 2 months from the date of delivery. Suppose the paper received by the editor will be transmitted to the section editor according to the fields of about one day. 3. Then the part editor will analyze for 10 days. 4. The section editor will send it to 2 reviews with a budget of one month. The results obtained will be notified to the author one day after the reviewers' conclusions are summarized.
